In a landmark resolution, the British government has agreed to compensate over 7,500 residents of Laikipia County, Kenya, with a payout of Sh505 million following a devastating fire allegedly sparked by British troops during a military training exercise in 2021.
The inferno, which tore through the Lolldaiga Conservancy, scorched more than 12,000 acres of land and left a trail of destruction across neighboring villages. Residents suffered extensive losses, including homes, livestock, crops, and long-term health complications due to smoke inhalation and environmental contamination.
The settlement, classified as an “ex gratia” payment, means the British government has not formally admitted liability but chose to resolve the matter outside further court proceedings3. The compensation follows a four-year legal battle led by local advocates and community leaders, culminating in a court order that compelled the British Army Training Unit Kenya (BATUK) to address the damages.
Lawyer Kelvin Kubai, who represented the victims, hailed the payout as a constitutional victory and a step toward accountability. “This is a success story—it’s the first time we’ve ever won a case against the British Army in Kenya,” said Laikipia MP Cate Waruguru, though she noted that many victims felt the compensation was insufficient given the scale of their suffering.
Individual payouts range from Sh22,500 to Sh2.5 million, depending on the extent of damage suffered. While some residents celebrated the long-awaited justice, others voiced frustration over the modest sums, especially in light of the environmental degradation and health issues that persist.
The Lolldaiga fire has reignited calls for stricter oversight of foreign military activities in Kenya, particularly in ecologically sensitive areas. Advocates argue that military training and conservation efforts are incompatible and urge the government to reassess agreements that allow foreign troops to operate in such regions.
As the dust settles, the Laikipia case stands as a precedent for communities seeking redress for damages caused by foreign entities. It also underscores the importance of legal advocacy and community resilience in the face of institutional power.
